Minor improvements

slides.tex

@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
 %\usepackage{xcolor}
 %\definecolor{codecolor}{HTML}{FFC300}
 
+\usepackage[super]{nth}
+\usepackage{csquotes}
+
 \title{VEGO-Engine}
 \subtitle{A student project}
 \author{Benedikt, Nicole}
@@ -39,7 +42,7 @@
 \subsection{The project}
 \begin{frame}{The assigment}
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item "Development of a fantasy game console" (similar to Pico8)
+    \item \enquote{Development of a fantasy game console} (similar to Pico8)
     \item For simple Arcade like games (think Pong/Space Invaders)
     \item Goal was to teach how to manage and program within a larger project
 \end{itemize}
@@ -47,22 +50,22 @@
 \begin{frame}{Our interpretation and goals}
 \begin{itemize}
     \item Started out with a Minigame
-    \item Realized we can split it into "Engine" and "Game Specific" Content
+    \item Realized we can split it into \enquote{Engine} and \enquote{Game Specific} Content
 \end{itemize}
     \Rightarrow We could then build on what we have while simultaneously having an implementation using the engine
     
-    Smart right :D ?...
+    Smart right :D ?\dots
 \end{frame}
 \begin{frame}
     What awaited us was about the equivalent of trying to neatly sort single spaghetti strands next to each other after
     it has previously been generously mixed with some *juicy* pasta sauce.
     
-    In other words, quite a messy endeavor...
+    In other words, quite a messy endeavor\dots
 \end{frame}
 \begin{frame}{Roadmap}
-3st Semester - learning SDL
+\nth{3} Semester - learning SDL
 
-4th/5th Semester - making the engine
+\nth{4} and \nth{5} Semester - making the engine
 \end{frame}
 
 \section{Learnings}
@@ -86,6 +89,8 @@ Hate
     \item git-modules - do not bloat contributions
 }
 
+\subsection{ECS}
+% ECS slides, split into 3 sections
 \begin{frame}[allowframebreaks, fragile]{We made an ECS}
 Why an ECS - Entity Component System?
 \begin{itemize}
@@ -98,7 +103,7 @@ Why an ECS - Entity Component System?
 \note[itemize]{
     \item Reusable code mainly on engine side, but also applies to game dev components
     \item plug and play mostly an advantage for game dev - i.e. "I want physics, here are physics"
-    \item \say{video series} - tease issue of abruptly ending
+    \item \enquote{video series} - tease issue of abruptly ending
     \item Components usually only have data, and are querried by the system (hence ecS)
     \item System part used for rendering
 }
@@ -149,6 +154,8 @@ projectile.addComponent<ColliderComponent>(0.6f);
 \end{minted}
 \end{frame}
 \note{mention: this ease of use is our goal}
+
+\subsection{Memory Management}
 \begin{frame}[allowframebreaks, fragile]{Memory Management}
 \begin{minted}[linenos,autogobble]{c++}
 class Manager
@@ -167,12 +174,20 @@ private:
 \end{minted}
 \framebreak
 Does that solve memory management? Not quite:
-
 \begin{itemize}
     \item Missing separation of concern - manager also propagates update call
-    \item What if I want to "save" existing entities
+    \item Does not allow "saving" existing entities
-    \item Everything is an entity
 \end{itemize}
+Architectural issues like this are hard to solve this late in development
+
+However it does solve memory management\footnote{For \texttt{Entity} classes only, there are some leaks due to bad usage of the \texttt{SDL\_mixer} library}
+\end{frame}
+\note[itemize]{
+    \item \enquote{Perfect example of why our ECS is not ideal}
+    \item scene management - would replace manager - however manager is too widely used - break API consistency
+    \item classic example of good on surface level only for a beginner; transition to more such examples
+}
+
 \end{frame}
 
 %code example